Category of Content
Siting Experience Documents Only
Publication Date
Subject Matter
Country
Keywords
Identifying remaining socio-technical challenges at the national level: Switzerland
Identifying remaining socio-technical challenges at the national level: Switzerland
This report was written within the EU-project InSOTEC (www.insotec.eu) which aims to generate a better understanding of the complex interplay between the technical and the social in radioactive waste management and, in particular, in the design and implementation of geological disposal. In a first step 13 countries have been analysed in order to identify prevailing socio-technical challenges.
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Canada
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Canada
OECD/NEA: Australia
OECD/NEA: Australia
The Department of Energy Does Not Plan to Use an Abandoned Salt Mine at Lyons, Kansas, for Nuclear High-Level Waste Disposal (EMD-82-64)
The Department of Energy Does Not Plan to Use an Abandoned Salt Mine at Lyons, Kansas, for Nuclear High-Level Waste Disposal (EMD-82-64)
Letter to The Honorable Nancy L. Kassebaum from J. Dexter Peach, Director, U.S. General Accounting Office
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, National Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, First Review Conference
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, National Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, First Review Conference
On 10 March 1999, The Netherlands signed the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, which was subsequently formally ratified on 26 April 2000 and entered into force on 18 June 2001. The Joint Convention obliges each contracting party to apply widely recognized principles and tools in order to achieve and maintain high standards of safety during management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Regulations for Geological Disposal
Regulations for Geological Disposal
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Czech Republic
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Czech Republic
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Italy
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Italy
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in the United Kingdom
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in the United Kingdom
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Finland
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Finland
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Sweden
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Sweden
OECD/NEA: Slovak Republic
OECD/NEA: Slovak Republic
OECD/NEA: Spain
OECD/NEA: Spain
OECD/NEA: Korea
OECD/NEA: Korea
OECD/NEA: Sweden
OECD/NEA: Sweden
OECD/NEA: Hungary
OECD/NEA: Hungary
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Korea
Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning in Korea
OECD/NEA: Finland
OECD/NEA: Finland
OECD/NEA: Netherlands
OECD/NEA: Netherlands
OECD/NEA: France
OECD/NEA: France
OECD/NEA: Czech Republic
OECD/NEA: Czech Republic
OECD/NEA: Mexico
OECD/NEA: Mexico
Geological Challenges in Radioactive Waste Isolation
Geological Challenges in Radioactive Waste Isolation
Over the past forty years, the development of the technology needed to isolate radioactive waste in underground rock systems has been found to be a formidable problem. This is especially the case in connection with high-level waste (HLW) after its removal from operations in nuclear power plants. There is also the additional problem of isolating low- and intermediate-level waste (LILW).
Institutional Issues in the Planning and Implementation of a Program to Dispose of High-Level Radioactive Wastes
Institutional Issues in the Planning and Implementation of a Program to Dispose of High-Level Radioactive Wastes
The research reported here was initiated in January 1980 and performed for the Office of Policy and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Energy. The study arises from recognition by the DOE that the resolution of institutional issues is vital to the establishment of facilities to dispose of high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The disposal of HLW is an intensely difficult public policy problem.