Publication Date
Attach Document
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Voluntary_vs_Directed_Siting.pdf (1.58 MB) | 1.58 MB |
Abstract/Summary
Waste siting gridlock in the United States and Canada has led to experimentation with voluntary and hybrid or "mixed mode" siting. We review nuclear and hazardous waste voluntary siting (VS) results for selected cases in the U.S. and Canada. Findings indicate that VS is not a panacea. but that current siting efforts are inadequate tests of its potential. We suggest trials of improved VS protocols and more effort on hybrid approaches in which the developer chooses the site but is required to reach agreement on conditions with local stakeholders. Mixed mode siting may be better suited to the U.S. context and its three-tiered governmental system.