Category of Content
Siting Experience Documents Only
Publication Date
Subject Matter
Country
Keywords
Effects of the Presence of Axial Blankets and Integral Burnable Absorbers on the End Effect of PWR Burnup Profiles
Effects of the Presence of Axial Blankets and Integral Burnable Absorbers on the End Effect of PWR Burnup Profiles
Limited Burnup Credit for Increased Fuel Enrichments in a Swiss PWR Storage Pool
Limited Burnup Credit for Increased Fuel Enrichments in a Swiss PWR Storage Pool
Research Supporting Implementation of Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks
Research Supporting Implementation of Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks
Comparison of Computational Estimations of Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in PWR Burnup Credit
Comparison of Computational Estimations of Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in PWR Burnup Credit
Impact of Integral Burnable Absorbers on PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses
Impact of Integral Burnable Absorbers on PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses
Parametric Study of Control Rod Exposure for PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses
Parametric Study of Control Rod Exposure for PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses
Spent Fuel Criticality Benchmark Experiments
Spent Fuel Criticality Benchmark Experiments
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Australian National Report, July 2003
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Australian National Report, July 2003
The responsibility for the governance of Australia is shared by Australia's federal government (also known as the Commonwealth government) and the governments of the six states and two self governing territories. Responsibility for radiation health and safety in each State and Territory rests with the respective State/Territory government, unless the activity is carried out by a Commonwealth agency or a contractor to a Commonwealth agency; in those cases the activity is regulated by the Federal government (Commonwealth government of Australia).
The Burn-Up Credit Experimental Programme REBUS
The Burn-Up Credit Experimental Programme REBUS
Addressing the Axial Burnup Distribution in PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety
Addressing the Axial Burnup Distribution in PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety
Reactivity End-Effects Estimates Using a K Perturbation Model
Reactivity End-Effects Estimates Using a K Perturbation Model
Criticality Safety Evaluation of Fuel Storage Pools in Spain
Criticality Safety Evaluation of Fuel Storage Pools in Spain
A Validated Methodology for Evaluating Burnup Credit in Spent Fuel Casks
A Validated Methodology for Evaluating Burnup Credit in Spent Fuel Casks
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM-104
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM-104
Uncertainties in Criticality Analysis Which Affect the Storage and Transportation of LWR Fuel
Uncertainties in Criticality Analysis Which Affect the Storage and Transportation of LWR Fuel
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM 103
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM 103
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material
Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material
Reactivity and Isotopic Composition of Spent PWR Fuel as a Function of Initial Enrichment, Burnup, and Cooling Time
Reactivity and Isotopic Composition of Spent PWR Fuel as a Function of Initial Enrichment, Burnup, and Cooling Time
Feasibility and Incentives for the Consideration of Spent Fuel Operating Histories in the Criticality Analysis of Spent Fuel Shipping Casks
Feasibility and Incentives for the Consideration of Spent Fuel Operating Histories in the Criticality Analysis of Spent Fuel Shipping Casks
Analyses have been completed that indicate the consideration of spent fuel histories (''burnup credit'') in the design of spent fuel shipping casks is a justifiable concept that would result in cost savings and public risk benefits in the transport of spent nuclear fuel. Since cask capacities could be increased over those of casks without burnup credit, the number of shipments necessary to transport a given amount of fuel could be reduced.
Characterization of LWR Spent Fuel MCC-Approved Testing Material--ATM-101
Characterization of LWR Spent Fuel MCC-Approved Testing Material--ATM-101
Generic Reactivity Equivalence of PWR Fuel in Spent Fuel Storage Racks
Generic Reactivity Equivalence of PWR Fuel in Spent Fuel Storage Racks
Conservative Axial Burnup Distributions for Actinide-Only Burnup Credit
Conservative Axial Burnup Distributions for Actinide-Only Burnup Credit
Partnering for Long-term Management of Radioactive Waste-Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries
Partnering for Long-term Management of Radioactive Waste-Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries
Fission Product Benchmarking for Burnup Credit Applications
Fission Product Benchmarking for Burnup Credit Applications
Progress toward developing a technical basis for a cost-effective burnup credit methodology for
spent nuclear fuel with initial U-235 enrichment up to 5% is presented. Present regulatory
practices provide as much burnup credit flexibility as can be currently expected. Further progress
is achievable by incorporating the negative reactivity effects of a subset of neutron-absorbing
fission product isotopes. Progress also depends on optimizing the procedure for establishing the