Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Country

Keywords

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

Application of Sensitivity/Uncertainty Methods to Burnup Credit Criticality Validation

Application of Sensitivity/Uncertainty Methods to Burnup Credit Criticality Validation

Author(s)
Mueller, D. E. ,
Wagner, J. C.
Publication Date
The responsible use of calculational methods in nuclear criticality safety includes a determination of bias and bias uncertainty that may exist between the calculated results and reality. Such biases exist due to approximations used to model the real world, uncertainties in nuclear data, and approximations associated with the calculational method (e.g., Monte Carlo method). The bias and bias uncertainty are typically determined by using the modeling approximations, nuclear data, and calculational method to model well-known, usually critical, systems.
burnup credit criticality analysis iaea-tecdoc-1547 iaea sensitivity analysis

U.S. Regulatory Recommendations for Actinide-Only Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks

U.S. Regulatory Recommendations for Actinide-Only Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Withee, C. J. ,
Wagner, J. C. ,
Parks, C. V.
Publication Date

In July 1999, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Spent Fuel Project Office
(SFPO) issued Interim Staff Guidance 8 Revision 1 (ISG8R1) to provide recommendations for the use
of burnup credit in storage and transport of pressurized-water reactor (PWR) spent fuel. Subsequent to
the issuance of ISG8R1, the NRC Office of Regulatory Research (RES) has directed an effort to
investigate the technical basis for extending the criteria and recommendations of ISG8R1 to allow

burnup credit criticality analysis iaea-tecdoc-1547 iaea regulations

A Coordinated U.S. Program to Address Full Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks

A Coordinated U.S. Program to Address Full Burnup Credit in Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Parks, C. V. ,
Wagner, J. C.
Publication Date

The benefits of burnup credit and the technical issues associated with utilizing burnup credit in spent
nuclear fuel (SNF) casks have been studied in the United States for almost two decades. The issuance of the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff guidance for actinide-only burnup credit in 2002 was a
significant step toward providing a regulatory framework for using burnup credit in transport casks. However,
adherence to the current regulatory guidance (e.g., limit credit to actinides) enables only about 30% of the existing

burnup credit criticality analysis iaea-tecdoc-1547 iaea general

Advances in Applications of Burnup Credit to Enhance Spent Fuel Transportation, Storage, Reprocessing and Disposition-Proceedings of a Technical Meeting held in London, 29 August-2 September 2006

Advances in Applications of Burnup Credit to Enhance Spent Fuel Transportation, Storage, Reprocessing and Disposition-Proceedings of a Technical Meeting held in London, 29 August-2 September 2006

Publication Date

This publication records the proceedings of a technical meeting organized by the IAEA and
held in London 29 August–2 September 2005 with sixty participants from 18 countries. As
indicated in the title, the objective of this meeting was to provide a forum for exchange of
technical information on spent fuel burnup credit applications and thereby compile state-ofthe-
art information on technical advances related to spent fuel transportation, storage,
reprocessing and disposition.

burnup credit criticality analysis iaea-tecdoc-1547 proceedings london 2005

Second Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Kingdom of Belgium National Report

SED Publication Type

Second Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Kingdom of Belgium National Report

Author
Federal Agency for Nuclear Control on behalf of Belgium. Contributions were also made by ONDRAF/NIRAS, Electrabel, Association Vinçotte Nuclear and the SCK•CEN
Publication Date

On 8 December 1997 Belgium has signed the Joint Convention. The Belgian legislator has expressed its consent with the obligations resulting from the Convention via the Law of 2 August 2002. The ratification was obtained on 5 September 2002. The Convention became effective on 4 December 2002, or 90 days after the Ratification Act had been deposited. Belgium belongs to the group of Contracting Parties having at least one operational nuclear generating unit on their territory.

siting national report joint convention spent fuel management belgium radioactive waste management

Kingdom of Belgium, Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Second Review Meeting (May 2006), Answers to the Questions of Contracting Parties on the National Report submitted by Belgium

SED Publication Type

Kingdom of Belgium, Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Second Review Meeting (May 2006), Answers to the Questions of Contracting Parties on the National Report submitted by Belgium

Author
Federal Agency for Nuclear Control on behalf of Belgium. Contributions were also made by ONDRAF/NIRAS, Electrabel, Association Vinçotte Nuclear and the SCK•CEN
Publication Date

Kingdom of Belgium, Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Second Review Meeting (May 2006), Answers to the Questions of Contracting Parties on the National Report submitted by Belgium

siting national report joint convention spent fuel management belgium radioactive waste management

Kingdom of Belgium Fourth Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management National Report

SED Publication Type

Kingdom of Belgium Fourth Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management National Report

Author
Kingdom of Belgium
Publication Date

On 8 December 1997 Belgium signed the Joint Convention. The Belgian legislator has expressed its consent with the obligations resulting from the Convention by the Law of 2 August 2002. The ratification followed on 5 September 2002. The Convention became effective on 4 December 2002, i.e. 90 days following ratification. Belgium belongs to the group of Contracting Parties having at least one operational nuclear power plant on their territory.

siting national report joint convention spent fuel management belgium radioactive waste management

Technical overview of the SAFIR 2 report: Safety Assessment and Feasibility Interim Report 2

SED Publication Type

Technical overview of the SAFIR 2 report: Safety Assessment and Feasibility Interim Report 2

Author
Belgium ,
ONDRAF/NIRAS
Publication Date

This document is the technical overview of the SAFIR 2 report that synthesises all of the technical and scientific knowledge available at the end of the second phase (1990–2000) of the ONDRAF/NIRAS programme of methodological research and development on the final disposal of category B and C waste in a poorly-indurated clay formation. The SAFIR 2 report will be handed over by ONDRAF/NIRAS to its supervisory Minister at the beginning of 2002, after publication approval by its Board of Directors.

disposal repository siting belgium

Identifying remaining socio-technical challenges at the national level: Belgium

SED Publication Type

Identifying remaining socio-technical challenges at the national level: Belgium

Author
Jantine Schroder ,
Anne Bergmans
Publication Date

This report is part of the research project International Socio-Technical Challenges for Implementing Geological Disposal: InSOTEC (see www.insotec.eu), funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme.<br/>This report is a contribution to Work Package 1 of the project, which aims to identify the most significant socio-technical challenges related to geological disposal of radioactive waste. To achieve this objective, a comparative analysis of 14 national programmes will be performed.

public perception waste management siting belgium wp 1 ms 3
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: