Skip to main content
Author
Carnes, S. A.
Copenhaver, E. D.
Reed, J. H.
Soderstrom, E. J.
Sorensen, J. H.
Peelle, E.
Bjornstad, D. J.
Publication Date
Attach Document
Attachment Size
Incentatives_and_Siting_Process_for_RW_facilities.pdf (1.79 MB) 1.79 MB
Abstract/Summary

The importance of social and institutional issues in the siting of nuclear waste facilities has been recognized in recent years. Limited evidence from a survey of rural Wisconsin residents in 1980 indicates that incentives may help achieve the twin goals of increasing local support and decreasing local opposition to hosting nuclear waste facilities. Incentives are classified according to functional categories (i.e., mitigation, compensation, and reward) and the conditions which may be prerequisites to the use of incentives are outlined (i.e.., guarantee of public health and safety, some measure of local control, and a legitimation of negotiations during siting). Criteria for evaluating the utility of incentives in nuclear waste repository siting are developed. Incentive packages may be more useful than single incentives, and nonmonetary<br/>incentives, such as independent monitoring and access to credible information, may be as important in eliciting support as monetary incentives. Without careful attention to prerequisites in the siting process it is not likely that incentives will facilitate the siting<br/>process.

Document Type
SED Publication Type
Country
United States