Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Country

Keywords

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

Data Qualification Report: Mineralogy Data for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project

Data Qualification Report: Mineralogy Data for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project

Author(s)
T.L. Steinborn
Publication Date
This DQR uses the technical assessment methods according to Attachment 2 of AP-SIII.2Q, Rev. 0, ICN 3, to qualify DTN LADB831321AN98.002. The data addressed in this DQR have been cited in CRWMS M&O (2000b) to support the Site Recommendation in determining the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a repository for high level nuclear waste. CRWMS M&O (2000b) refers to mineral analyses that are unqualified.
yucca mountain repository license application data qualification tdr-nbs-hs-000005 minerals xrd mineral concentration

Qualification of Thermodynamic Data for Geochemical Modeling of Mineral–Water Interactions in Dilute Systems

Qualification of Thermodynamic Data for Geochemical Modeling of Mineral–Water Interactions in Dilute Systems

Author(s)
Sandia National Laboratories
Publication Date

This report is developed from Technical Work Plan for: Thermodynamic Databases for Chemical Modeling (BSC 2006 [DIRS 177885]). The purpose of this analysis report is to update the thermochemical database data0.ymp.R4 (Output DTN: SN0410T0510404.002). Various data have been added, corrected, or corroborated, partly in response to four Condition Reports (CRs): CR 6489, CR 6731, CR 7542, and CR 7756. The most notable changes are a general revision of phosphate data to achieve consistency with the recommendations from the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) (Cox. et al.

yucca mountain corrosion criticality monitoring radionuclide transport geochemical analysis data qualification

The Partnership Approach to Siting and Developing Radioactive Waste Management Facilities

SED Publication Type

The Partnership Approach to Siting and Developing Radioactive Waste Management Facilities

Author
NEA
Publication Date

History shows that the search for sites for radioactive waste management facilities has been marred by conflicts and delays. Affected communities have often objected that their concerns and interests were not addressed. In response, institutions have progressively turned away from the traditional “decide, announce and defend” model, and are learning to “engage, interact and co-operate”. This shift has fostered the emergence of partnerships between the proponent of the facility and the potential host community, as shown in a recent NEA study.

public perception nea waste management siting community interaction
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: