Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Subject Matter

Keywords

Displaying 201 - 225 of 229

International Collaboration Activities in Different Geologic Disposal Environments

International Collaboration Activities in Different Geologic Disposal Environments

Author(s)
Jens Birkholzer ,
Boris Faybishenko ,
Patrick Dobson ,
Patricia M. Fox ,
Jonny Rutqvist ,
Liange Zheng (LBNL) ,
Florie Caporuscio ,
Paul Reimus ,
Hari Viswanathan ,
Carlos Jové-Colón ,
Yifeng Wang ,
Kristopher L. Kuhlman ,
Edward Matteo ,
Kevin McMahon ,
Mavrik Zavarin
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Advances in GDSA Framework Development and Process Model Integration

Advances in GDSA Framework Development and Process Model Integration

Author(s)
P Mariner ,
M Nole ,
E Basurto ,
T Berg ,
K Chang ,
B Debusschere ,
A Eckert ,
M Ebeida ,
M Gross ,
G Hammond ,
J Harvey ,
S Jordan ,
K Kuhlman ,
T LaForce ,
R Leone ,
W McLendon III ,
M Mills ,
H Park ,
F Perry ,
Salazar III ,
D Seidl ,
S Sevougian ,
E Stein ,
L Swiler
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Evaluation of Spent Fuel Disposition in Crystalline Rocks FY18 Progress Report

Evaluation of Spent Fuel Disposition in Crystalline Rocks FY18 Progress Report

Author(s)
Wang ,
Hadgu ,
Kalinina ,
Jerden ,
Gattu ,
Ebert ,
Viswanathan ,
Boukhalfa ,
Chu ,
Hyman ,
Karra ,
Makendonska ,
Reimus ,
Telfeyan ,
Zheng ,
Deng ,
Nakagawa ,
Kim ,
Kneafsey ,
Dobson ,
Borglin ,
Doughty ,
Voltolini ,
Zavarin ,
Balboni ,
Atkins-Duffin
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Public Preferences Related to Radioactive Waste Management, Nuclear Energy, and Environment: Methodology and Response Reference Report for the 2014 Energy and Environment Survey?

Public Preferences Related to Radioactive Waste Management, Nuclear Energy, and Environment: Methodology and Response Reference Report for the 2014 Energy and Environment Survey?

Author(s)
Kerry G. Herron ,
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith ,
Carol L. Silva ,
Kuhika Gupta
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Insights on Conducting Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of US Residents

Insights on Conducting Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of US Residents

Author(s)
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith ,
Kuhika Gupta ,
Carol L. Silva ,
Kerry G. Herron ,
Joseph T. Ripberger ,
Matthew Nowlin ,
Rob P. Rechard
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities for Storage and Disposal: Analyzing Variations over Time, Events, and Program Designs

Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities for Storage and Disposal: Analyzing Variations over Time, Events, and Program Designs

Author(s)
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith ,
Carol L. Silva ,
Kerry G. Herron ,
Kuhika G. Ripberger ,
Matthew Nowlin ,
Joseph Ripberger ,
Evaristo “Tito” Bonano ,
Rob P. Rechard
Publication Date
Abstract does not exist for this document.

Data Qualification Report: Mineralogy Data for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project

Data Qualification Report: Mineralogy Data for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project

Author(s)
T.L. Steinborn
Publication Date
This DQR uses the technical assessment methods according to Attachment 2 of AP-SIII.2Q, Rev. 0, ICN 3, to qualify DTN LADB831321AN98.002. The data addressed in this DQR have been cited in CRWMS M&O (2000b) to support the Site Recommendation in determining the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a repository for high level nuclear waste. CRWMS M&O (2000b) refers to mineral analyses that are unqualified.
yucca mountain repository license application data qualification tdr-nbs-hs-000005 minerals xrd mineral concentration

Science based responses to social myths on nuclear energy

Science based responses to social myths on nuclear energy

Author(s)
Robert Hayes
Publication Date

In order to promote a sound basis for considering the role of nuclear in climate change, this review spans the technical topics of social and political debate surrounding nuclear energy with a focus on the objective science of these issues including nuclear waste, accidents and overall risk. Novel aspects include the emergence of nuclear energy as being potentially renewable and the antithesis of Fukushima being an argument for the unacceptable risks associated with the use of nuclear energy.

Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: 2022 Update

Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: 2022 Update

Author(s)
U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Publication Date

In October 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board or NWTRB) published Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel.  For each of the 13 national programs studied, the report catalogued 15 institutional arrangements that had been set in place and 15 technical approaches that had been taken to design repository systems for the long-term management of high-activity radioactive waste.

Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: