Category of Content
Siting Experience Documents Only
Publication Date
Subject Matter
Keywords
SNF Modeling and Testing - LANL (FY21)
SNF Modeling and Testing - LANL (FY21)
Contribution to L2 Milestone: SNL Overall Control Account
Contribution to L2 Milestone: SNL Overall Control Account
Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Nine Shutdown Sites
Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Nine Shutdown Sites
Sequestration of radioactive iodine in silver-palladium phases incommercial spent nuclear fuel
Sequestration of radioactive iodine in silver-palladium phases incommercial spent nuclear fuel
Used Fuel Disposition Storage, Transportation and Disposal Interface Study
Used Fuel Disposition Storage, Transportation and Disposal Interface Study
A Comprehensive Monte Carlo Sampling Uncertainty Quantification Methodology for Used Nuclear Fuel
A Comprehensive Monte Carlo Sampling Uncertainty Quantification Methodology for Used Nuclear Fuel
Categorization of Used Nuclear Fuel
Categorization of Used Nuclear Fuel
Experimental Results for SimFuels
Experimental Results for SimFuels
Concepts for Small-Scale Testing of Used Nuclear Fuel
Concepts for Small-Scale Testing of Used Nuclear Fuel
Used Fuel Disposition Storage, Transportation and Disposal Interface Study
Used Fuel Disposition Storage, Transportation and Disposal Interface Study
Online Waste Library (OWL) and Waste Forms Characteristics Annual Report
Online Waste Library (OWL) and Waste Forms Characteristics Annual Report
Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility in the Waste Management System
Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility in the Waste Management System
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Multi-Year Plan to Prepare DOE-Managed Spent fuel for Transportation
Multi-Year Plan to Prepare DOE-Managed Spent fuel for Transportation
Potential Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility for Commercial SNF
Potential Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility for Commercial SNF
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Cost Sensitivity Analysis for Consolidated Interim Storage of Spent Fuel: Evaluating the Effect of Economic Environment Parameters
Cost Sensitivity Analysis for Consolidated Interim Storage of Spent Fuel: Evaluating the Effect of Economic Environment Parameters
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Socio-technical multi-criteria evaluation of long-term spent nuclear fuel management strategies: A framework and method
Socio-technical multi-criteria evaluation of long-term spent nuclear fuel management strategies: A framework and method
In the absence of a federal geologic repository or consolidated, interim storage in the United States, commercial spent fuel will remain stranded at some 75 sites across the country. Currently, these include 18 “orphaned sites” where spent fuel has been left at decommissioned reactor sites.
Community Involvement Plan: Area IV, Santa Susana Field Laboratory
Community Involvement Plan: Area IV, Santa Susana Field Laboratory
As a result of the 2007 ruling by the U.S. District Court of Northern California that the DOE must prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate alternatives for cleanup of Area IV of the SSFL, DOE has implemented major changes in its management of SSFL Area IV. As an initial step, this community involvement plan (CIP) outlines a series of activities and programs that intend to engage the public, establish transparency in DOE actions and decisions, and increase input from the community.
Topical Analysis of Nuclear Experts' Perceptions of Publics, Nuclear Energy, and Sustainable Futures
Topical Analysis of Nuclear Experts' Perceptions of Publics, Nuclear Energy, and Sustainable Futures
Nuclear energy experts consider commercial power from fission to be a strong contender to help mitigate the increasing effects of climate change, in part due to its low-to-no carbon emissions. Nevertheless, nuclear energy's history, including meltdowns such as Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, and dumping in sacred Indigenous land such as Yucca Mountain, raises important concerns in public deliberation over nuclear power.
Nuclear power and the public: an update of collected research on nuclear power
Nuclear power and the public: an update of collected research on nuclear power
The purpose of this research was to collect, analyze, and summarize all of the nuclear power-related surveys conducted in the United States through June, 1981, that we could obtain. The surveys collected were national, statewide, and areawide in scope. Slightly over 100 surveys were collected for an earlier, similar effort carried out in 1977. About 130 new surveys were added to the earlier survey data. Thus, about 230 surveys were screened for inclusion in this report.