Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Subject Matter

Keywords

Displaying 1 - 25 of 62

Criticality Consequence Calculation Involving Intact PWR MOX SNF in a Degraded 21 PWR Assembly Waste Package

Criticality Consequence Calculation Involving Intact PWR MOX SNF in a Degraded 21 PWR Assembly Waste Package

Author(s)
John A. McClure
Publication Date
The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate the transient behavior and consequences of a worstcase criticality event involving intact pressurized water reactor (PWR) mixed-oxide (MOX) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in a degraded basket configuration inside a 21 PWR waste package (WP). This calculation will provide information necessary for demonstrating that the consequences of a worst-case criticality event involving intact PWR MOX SNF are insignificant in their effect on the overall radioisotopic inventory and on the integrity of the repository.
yucca mountain criticality analysis mox fuel pwr snf

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

Author(s)
Paul L. Cloke
Publication Date
The Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Waste Package Operations of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating (CRWMS M&O) contractor performed calculations to provide input to the design of a waste package (WP). This document analyzes the degradation processes of two types of pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF): • Fuel fabricated from low enriched uranium oxide, which has been used, or will ~ used, in commercial nuclear power plants.
criticality low-enriched uranium monitored geologic repository storage mox fuel waste package degradation pwr snf corrosion plutonium oxide geochemical analysis bba000000-01717-0210-00009 uranium oxide

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Comparison Between Once-Through and Plutonium Multi-Recycling in Fast Reactors

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Comparison Between Once-Through and Plutonium Multi-Recycling in Fast Reactors

Author(s)
Electric Power Research Institute
Publication Date

This report presents results from a parametric study of equilibrium fuel cycle costs for a closed fuel cycle with multi-recycling of plutonium in fast reactors (FRs) compared to an open, once-through fuel cycle using PWRs. The study examines the impact on fuel cycle costs from changes in the unit costs of uranium, advanced PUREX reprocessing of discharged uranium dioxide (UO2) fuel and fast-reactor mixed-oxide (FR-MOX) fuel, and FR-MOX fuel fabrication.

reprocessing fast reactor nuclear fuel cycle plutonium recycling waste management blue ribbon commission advanced fuel cycle mox fuel cost comparison advanced nuclear fuel cycle fast reactors once-through fuel cycle

Program on Technology Innovation: Readiness of Existing and New U.S. Reactors for Mixed-Oxide (MOX) Fuel

Program on Technology Innovation: Readiness of Existing and New U.S. Reactors for Mixed-Oxide (MOX) Fuel

Author(s)
Electric Power Research Institute
Publication Date

Expanding interest in nuclear power and advanced fuel cycles indicate that use of mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel in the current and new U.S. reactor fleet could become an option for utilities in the coming decades. In light of this renewed interest, EPRI has reviewed the substantial knowledge base on MOX fuel irradiation in light water reactors (LWRs). The goal was to evaluate the technical feasibility of MOX fuel use in the U.S. reactor fleet for both existing and advanced LWR designs (Generation III/III+).

nuclear fuel cycle plutonium recycling light water reactor advanced fuel cycle mox fuel plutonium oxide

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Comparison Between Once-Through and Plutonium Single-Recycling in Pressurized Water Reactors

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Comparison Between Once-Through and Plutonium Single-Recycling in Pressurized Water Reactors

Author(s)
Electric Power Research Institute
Publication Date

Within the context of long-term waste management and sustainable nuclear fuel supply, there continue to be discussions regarding whether the United States should consider recycling of light-water reactor (LWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) for the current fleet of U.S. LWRs. This report presents a parametric study of equilibrium fuel cycle costs for an open fuel cycle without plutonium recycling (once-through) and with plutonium recycling (single-recycling using mixed-oxide, or MOX, fuel), assuming an all-pressurized water reactor (PWR) fleet.

nuclear fuel cycle plutonium recycling waste management recycling economics mox fuel cost comparison spent nuclear fuel once-through fuel cycle pressurized water reactor

slides - CFD Best Practice Guidelines (NUREG-2152), Thermal Modeling Issues, and Generic Communications Related to Vacuum Drying Operations

slides - CFD Best Practice Guidelines (NUREG-2152), Thermal Modeling Issues, and Generic Communications Related to Vacuum Drying Operations

Author(s)
Solis, J.
Publication Date

Presented at the NEI Used Fuel Management Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, May 7-9, 2013

slides nei used fuel management meeting cfd thermal modeling vacuum drying
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: