The Likelihood of Criticality Following Disposal of SF/HLW/HEU/Pu
Publication Date
Document URL(s)
Abstract
The Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) is responsible for implementing
geological disposal of the UK’s higher-activity radioactive wastes. RWMD’s research into
geological disposal considers safety during waste transport to a disposal facility, during
waste disposal operations, and once the facility has been closed. The wastes for disposal
comprise a wide range of materials and include some fissile radionuclides. The presence of
fissile materials requires an assessment of the potential for criticality.
After disposal, the engineered barrier system of a geological disposal facility (GDF) will
ensure that criticality is prevented for such time as the waste packaging affords a high level
of containment. However, as waste packages begin to degrade, fissile and other materials
may be mobilised and this could affect the potential for criticality. Therefore, the possibility
for the evolution of conditions in a GDF to lead to criticality requires consideration.
RWMD established the Likelihood of Criticality research project to develop, document and
communicate the qualitative and quantitative arguments required to evaluate the probability
of nuclear criticality after closure of a GDF. The evaluation of the probability of criticality has
been underpinned by consideration of the features, events and processes (FEPs) that could
affect nuclear reactivity after GDF closure. The FEP analysis led to the construction of postclosure
criticality scenarios and these scenarios have been evaluated using a range of
approaches, from high-level judgments about scenario credibility, to modelling of evolving
conditions in a GDF to determine if critical systems could develop. Understanding the
radioactive waste inventories, the GDF concepts for the different waste types and geological
settings, and the expected evolution of conditions in the different GDF concepts, as well as
associated uncertainties, has been of fundamental importance to the criticality FEP and
scenario analysis.
Additional Information
AMEC Report Reference: 17293-TR-022, Client Reference: RWMD/003/001, Issue Number: Version 2