Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Subject Matter

Keywords

Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

OECD/NEA Burnup Credit Criticality Benchmark, Analysis of Phase II-B Results: Conceptual PWR Spent Fuel Transportation Cask

OECD/NEA Burnup Credit Criticality Benchmark, Analysis of Phase II-B Results: Conceptual PWR Spent Fuel Transportation Cask

Author(s)
Nouri, A.
Publication Date
The OECD/NEA “Burn-up Credit Criticality Benchmark” working group has studied the effect of axial burn-up profile on the criticality of a realistic PWR spent fuel transport cask (Phase II-B). The final results of this benchmark are presented and analysed in this report. Nine basic cases and two additional accident configurations were considered with the following varying parameters: burn-up (0 GWd/t for fresh fuel, 30 and 50 GWd/t), fuel composition (actinides only and actinides with fifteen fission products), axial burn-up discretisation (1 or 9 zones).
criticality pwr fuel transport cask end effect source convergence burnup axial burnup profile

Research Supporting Implementation of Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Assessment of Transport and Storage Casks

Research Supporting Implementation of Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Assessment of Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Parks, C. V. ,
Gauld, I. C. ,
Wagner, J. C. ,
Broadhead, B. L. ,
DeHart, M. D. ,
Ebert, D. D.
Publication Date
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Regulatory Research (RES) has initiated a program to support effective implementation of burnup credit in the criticality safety assessment of transport and dry storage casks. The goal is to develop technical bases that can be used to provide criteria and guidance for use in licensing activities. The program is being conducted in a phased approach, with the initial focus on unresolved issues related to the use of actinide-only bumupcredit in transport and dry storage casks designed for spent fuel from pressurized-water reaciors (PWRs).
burnup credit transport cask storage cask criticality safety analysis

Spent Fuel Project Office, ISG-8 - Limited Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Spent Fuel Project Office, ISG-8 - Limited Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Spent Fuel Project Office, NRC
Publication Date

Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance - 8

pwr spent fuel transport cask storage cask criticality safety analysis isg-8 interim staff guidance limited burnup credit used fuel

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 1, Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 1, Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Spent Fuel Project Office, NRC

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 1

burnup credit pwr spent fuel transport cask storage cask criticality safety analysis isg-8 interim staff guidance used fuel

Issues for Effective Implementation of Burnup Credit

Issues for Effective Implementation of Burnup Credit

Author(s)
Parks, C. V. ,
Wagner, J. C.
Publication Date

In the United States, burnup credit has been used in the criticality safety evaluation for storage pools at
pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and considerable work has been performed to lay the foundation for use of
burnup credit in dry storage and transport cask applications and permanent disposal applications. Many of the
technical issues related to the basic physics phenomena and parameters of importance are similar in each of these
applications. However, the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States has never been fully integrated and the

burnup credit pwr dry cask storage transport cask

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 2, Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 2, Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport and Storage Casks

Author(s)
Spent Fuel Project Office, NRC
Publication Date

Spent Fuel Project Office, Interim Staff Guidance - 8, Revision 2 - Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transport
and Storage Casks

burnup credit pwr spent fuel transport cask storage cask criticality safety analysis isg-8 interim staff guidance used fuel

DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the CLINTON POWER STATION

DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the CLINTON POWER STATION

Author(s)
TLG Services, Inc. ,
Exelon Generation Company, LLC ,
William Cloutier ,
John Carlson ,
Francis Seymore
Publication Date

<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">

isfsi wet storage decommissioning cost estimate exelon clinton ml13063a531 e16-1640-006

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE RATES UNDER WHOLESALE POWER CONTRACTS

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE RATES UNDER WHOLESALE POWER CONTRACTS

Author(s)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Publication Date

<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">

isfsi maine yankee connecticut yankee wet storage yankee rowe shutdown sites cost estimate yankees er13-1395-000 er13-1399-000 143 ferc 61289 er13-1397-000

Cost Estimation Inputs for SNF Geologic Disposal Concepts

Cost Estimation Inputs for SNF Geologic Disposal Concepts

Author(s)
Ernest Hardin ,
Elena Kalinina
Publication Date

A set of 16 geologic disposal concepts is described in sufficient detail for rough-order-of-magnitude repository cost estimates, for disposal of spent nuclear reactor fuel in generic crystalline, argillaceous, and salt host geologic media. The description includes total length, diameter, and volume for all underground shafts, ramps, drifts and large-diameter borings. Basic types of ground support are specified. Total repository capacity is assumed to be approximately 140,000 MT of spent fuel, but concepts are described in terms of modular panels each containing 10,000 MT.

geologic disposal cost estimate sand2016-0235
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: