Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Subject Matter

Keywords

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

Author(s)
Paul L. Cloke
Publication Date
The Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Waste Package Operations of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating (CRWMS M&O) contractor performed calculations to provide input to the design of a waste package (WP). This document analyzes the degradation processes of two types of pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF): • Fuel fabricated from low enriched uranium oxide, which has been used, or will ~ used, in commercial nuclear power plants.
criticality low-enriched uranium monitored geologic repository storage mox fuel waste package degradation pwr snf corrosion plutonium oxide geochemical analysis bba000000-01717-0210-00009 uranium oxide

Intact and Degraded Mode Criticality Calculations for the Codisposal of ATR Spent Nuclear Fuel in a Waste Package

Intact and Degraded Mode Criticality Calculations for the Codisposal of ATR Spent Nuclear Fuel in a Waste Package

Author(s)
Dionisie R. Moscalu
Publication Date
The objective of this calculation is to perform intact and degraded mode criticality evaluations of the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) placed in the DOE standardized SNF canister. This analysis evaluates the codisposal of the DOE SNF canister containing the ATR SNF in a 5-Defense High-Level Waste (%-DHLW) Short Waste Package (WP) (Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC [BSC] 2004a), which is to be placed in a monitored geologic repository (MGR).
criticality yucca mountain advanced test reactor monitored geologic repository co-disposal waste package doe spent nuclear fuel 5 dhlw wp waste package degradation spent fuel degradation atr spent nuclear fuel neutron multiplication factor cal-dsd-nu-000007

DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the CLINTON POWER STATION

DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the CLINTON POWER STATION

Author(s)
TLG Services, Inc. ,
Exelon Generation Company, LLC ,
William Cloutier ,
John Carlson ,
Francis Seymore
Publication Date

<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">

isfsi wet storage decommissioning cost estimate exelon clinton ml13063a531 e16-1640-006

Cost Estimation Inputs for SNF Geologic Disposal Concepts

Cost Estimation Inputs for SNF Geologic Disposal Concepts

Author(s)
Ernest Hardin ,
Elena Kalinina
Publication Date

A set of 16 geologic disposal concepts is described in sufficient detail for rough-order-of-magnitude repository cost estimates, for disposal of spent nuclear reactor fuel in generic crystalline, argillaceous, and salt host geologic media. The description includes total length, diameter, and volume for all underground shafts, ramps, drifts and large-diameter borings. Basic types of ground support are specified. Total repository capacity is assumed to be approximately 140,000 MT of spent fuel, but concepts are described in terms of modular panels each containing 10,000 MT.

geologic disposal cost estimate sand2016-0235
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: