Category of Content

Siting Experience Documents Only

Publication Date

Subject Matter

Keywords

Displaying 26 - 44 of 44

Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide

Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide

Author(s)
Fischhoff, Baruch ,
Brewer, Noel T. ,
Downs, Julie S.
Publication Date

Effective risk communication is essential to the well-being of any organization and those people who depend on it. Ineffective communication can cost lives, money, and reputations. Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide provides the scientific foundations for effective communication.

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation of PWR LEU and PWR MOX Spent Fuel Waste Packages

Author(s)
Paul L. Cloke
Publication Date
The Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Waste Package Operations of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating (CRWMS M&O) contractor performed calculations to provide input to the design of a waste package (WP). This document analyzes the degradation processes of two types of pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF): • Fuel fabricated from low enriched uranium oxide, which has been used, or will ~ used, in commercial nuclear power plants.
criticality low-enriched uranium monitored geologic repository storage mox fuel waste package degradation pwr snf corrosion plutonium oxide geochemical analysis bba000000-01717-0210-00009 uranium oxide

Probabilistic External Criticality Evaluation

Probabilistic External Criticality Evaluation

Author(s)
P. Gottlieb ,
J. R. Massari
Publication Date
This analysis is prepared by the Mined Geologic Disposal System (MGDS) Waste Package Development (WPD) department to provide a probabilistic evaluation of the potential for criticality of fissile material which has been transported from a geologic repository containing breached waste packages of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF). This analysis is part of a continuing investigation of the probability of criticality resulting from the emplacement of spent nuclear fuel in a geologic repository.
criticality safety mined geologic repository external criticality breached waste package

Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: 2022 Update

Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: 2022 Update

Author(s)
U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Publication Date

In October 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board or NWTRB) published Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel.  For each of the 13 national programs studied, the report catalogued 15 institutional arrangements that had been set in place and 15 technical approaches that had been taken to design repository systems for the long-term management of high-activity radioactive waste.

Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.
Sponsored by: