slides - ISFSI Security Rulemaking Update
slides - ISFSI Security Rulemaking Update
Presented at the NEI Used Fuel Management Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, May 7-9, 2013
Presented at the NEI Used Fuel Management Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, May 7-9, 2013
The purpose of the Foreign Research Reactor (FRR) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Shipments Institutional Program was to meet the goals and commitments of the Implementation Strategy Plan for the FRR SNF Shipments. This program provided a systematic approach to planning, implementing, evaluating, and validating preparedness for the first west coast shipment of SNF from Asian countries to the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL).
This report is part of a report series designed to document benchmark-quality radiochemical assay data
against which computer code predictions of isotopic composition for spent nuclear fuel can be validated
to establish the uncertainty and bias associated with the code predictions. The experimental data analyzed
in the present report were acquired from two international programs: (1) ARIANE and (2) REBUS, both
coordinated by Belgonucleaire. All measurements include extensive actinide and fission product data of
Consumers Energyhas fulfilled its promise to restore the Big Rock Point nuclear plant site to a greenfield — free for unrestricted use by new generations of Michigan residents.
The significance of this small 67-megawatt nuclear energy pioneer — tucked away along northwest Michigan’s picturesque shoreline — will long be remembered as a shining example of operational excellence and good citizenship.
The radionuclide characteristics of light-water-reactor (LWR) spent fuel play key roles in the design
and licensing activities for radioactive waste transportation systems, interim storage facilities, and the final
repository site. Several areas of analysis require detailed information concerning the time-dependent behavior
of radioactive nuclides including (1) neutron/gamma-ray sources for shielding studies, (2) fissile/absorber
concentrations for criticality safety determinations, (3) residual decay heat predictions for thermal
The purpose of this analysis report is to document the screening decisions and technical bases for inclusion or exclusion of each FEP identified as relevant to the TSPA and the Yucca Mountain disposal system, in accordance with the regulatory screening criteria identified for the Yucca Mountain Site.
Disposal of radioactive waste from nuclear weapons production and power generation has
caused public outcry and political consternation. Nuclear Wastes presents a critical review
of some waste management and disposal alternatives to the current national policy of
direct disposal of light water reactor spent fuel. The book offers clearcut conclusions for
what the nation should do today and what solutions should be explored for tomorrow.
The committee examines the currently used "once-through" fuel cycle versus different
U.S Court of Federal Claims Senior Judge James F. Merow issued a favorable ruling on September 30, 2006 for the three former Yankee nuclear power plants in their litigation with the federal government over its failure to remove used nuclear fuel from the three New England sites. Yankee Vice- President and Chief Financial Officer Michael Thomas said, “While the Court’s decision will need to be reviewed and evaluated, the Yankee companies’ initial reaction to the monetary award is very positive.
The Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CY) today announced that it has been notified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that its former plant site has been decommissioned in accordance with NRC procedures and regulations. The NRC has formally approved Connecticut Yankee’s Final Status Survey Reports in accordance with the License Termination Plan. The site under the federal license is now reduced to the approximately 5 acres surrounding the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation site.
The search for sites for radioactive waste management (RWM) facilities attracts attention from implementers, government bodies, local communities, and the public at large. Facility siting processes, in general, tend to be marred by conflicts, disagreements, and delays.
The Interim Staff Guidance on burnup credit (ISG-8) issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission’s (U.S. NRC) Spent Fuel Project Office recommends restricting the use of burnup credit to
assemblies that have not used burnable absorbers. This recommended restriction eliminates a large portion
of the currently discharged spent fuel assemblies from cask loading, and thus severely limits the practical
usefulness of burnup credit. In the absence of readily available information on burnable poison rod (BPR)
This report highlights the findings and conclusions of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (BRC) and presents recommendations for consideration by the Administration and Congress, as well as interested state, tribal and local governments, other stakeholders, and the public.
An Act to provide for the development of repositories for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, to establish a program of research, de- velopment, and demonstration regarding the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, and for other purposes.
This document summarizes DOE’s commercial nuclear energy RD&D program based on a R&D roadmap and on DOE/NE’s budget request for fiscal year 2011. The roadmap is written at a high level and is mostly qualitative in terms of activities, milestones and decisions to be made and does not contain budget information. The fiscal year 2011 budget request contains more specific and detailed information on activities, milestones, decisions, and budgets but only for fiscal year 2011 and the two preceding fiscal years.
Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance - 8
This study examines concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in its planning for transition from active waste site management and remediation to what the department terms “long-term stewardship.” It examines the scientific, technical, and organizational capabilities and limitations that must be taken into account in planning for the long-term institutional management of the department’s numerous waste sites that are the legacy to this country’s nuclear weapons program. It also identifies characteristics and design criteria for effective longterm institutional management.
Background Medical screening programs at three Departments of Energy (DOE)
nuclear weapons facilities (Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Oak Ridge, and the Savannah
River Site) have included audiometric testing since approximately 1996. This report
summarizes hearing evaluations through March 31, 2003.
Methods Occupational examinations included a medical history, limited physical
examination, and tests for medical effects from specific hazards, including audiometric
testing. Hearing thresholds by frequency for DOE workers were compared to agestandardized
Five commercial reactor criticals (CRCs) for the LaSalle Unit 1 boiling-water reactor
have been analyzed using KENO V.a, the Monte Carlo criticality code of the SCALE 4 code
system. The irradiated fuel assembly isotopics for the criticality analyses were provided by the
Waste Package Design team at the Yucca Mountain Project in the United States, who performed
the depletion calculations using the SAS2H sequence of SCALE 4. The reactor critical
measurements involved two beginning-of-cycle and three middle-of-cycle configurations. The
This report presents a formal analysis of the five sites nominated as
suitable for characterization for the first repository; the analysis is based
on the information contained or referenced in the environmental assessments
that accompany the site nominations (DOE, 1986a-e). It is intended to aid in
the site-recommendation decision by providing insights into the comparative
advantages and disadvantages of each site. Because no formal analysis can
account for all the factors important to a decision as complex as recommending
Presented at the NEI Used Fuel Management Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, May 7-9, 2013
The Disposal Subcommittee of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (BRC) addressed a wide-ranging set of issues, all bearing directly on the central question: “How can the United States go about establishing one or more disposal sites for high-level nuclear wastes in a manner and within a timeframe that is technically, socially, economically, and politically acceptable?”
The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Program, a United States (U.S.) Department of
Energy (DOE) program, is intended to support a safe, secure, and sustainable expansion of
nuclear energy, both domestically and internationally. Domestically, the GNEP Program would
promote technologies that support economic, sustained
production of nuclear-generated electricity, while
reducing the impacts associated with spent nuclear fuel
disposal and reducing proliferation risks. DOE envisions
changing the U.S. nuclear energy fuel cycle1 from an