An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Several changes have occurred since the issuance of NUREG-1536, “Standard Review Plan
(SRP) for Dry Cask Storage Systems,” that affect the staff’s approach to confinement
evaluation. The attachment to this ISG integrates the current staff approach into a revision of
ISG-5. The highlights of the changes include:
• Reflects October 1998 revisions to 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR 72.106.
• Expands and clarifies acceptance criteria associated with confinement analysis and
acceptance of “leak tight” testing instead of detailed confinement analysis.
The Standard Review Plan, NUREG-1536, Chapter 5, Section V, 2 recommends that “the
applicant calculate the source term on the basis of the fuel that will actually provide the
bounding source term,” and states that the applicant should, “either specify the minimum initial
enrichment or establish the specific source terms as operating controls and limits for cask use.”
A specified source term is difficult for most cask users to determine and for inspectors to verify.
Staff raised two major issues concerning the adverse effects of fission gases to the gas-mixture
thermal conductivity in a spent fuel canister in a post accident environment. The two major
concerns were: (1) the reduction of the thermal conductivity of the canister gas by the mixing of
fission gases expelled from failed fuel pins and (2) the resultant temperature and pressure rise
within the canister. Since the fission gas is typically of a lower conductivity than the cover gas,
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 71, Packaging and Transportation of
Radioactive Material, and 10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent
Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater
Than Class C Waste, require that spent nuclear fuel (SNF) remain subcritical in transportation
and storage, respectively. Unirradiated reactor fuel has a well-specified nuclide composition
that provides a straightforward and bounding approach to the criticality safety analysis of
The purpose of this ISG is to clarify the technical criteria for types of materials that will be |
considered associated with the storage of spent fuel assemblies. While control rods are |
mentioned in the Standard Review Plan as possible contents, specific information and guidance
is lacking.
Revision 1
There is no existing American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for the design
and fabrication of spent fuel dry storage casks. Therefore, ASME Code Section III, is
referenced by NUREG-1536, “Standard Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Systems,” as an
acceptable standard for the design and fabrication of dry storage casks. However, since dry
storage casks are not pressure vessels, ASME Code Section III, cannot be implemented
without allowing some alternatives to its requirements.
Revision 1
The staff has broadened the technical basis for the storage of spent fuel including assemblies
with average burnups exceeding 45 GWd/MTU. This revision to Interim Staff Guidance No. 11
(ISG-11) addresses the technical review aspects of and specifies the acceptance criteria for
limiting spent fuel reconfiguration in storage casks. It modifies the previous revision of the ISG
in three ways: (1) by clarifying the meaning of some of the acceptance criteria contained in
Fuel rod buckling analyses under bottom end drop conditions have traditionally been performed
to demonstrate integrity of the fuel following a cask drop accident. The methodology described
by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to analyze the buckling of irradiated spent
fuel assembly under a bottom end drop in their report UCID-21246 is a simplified approach. It
assumed that buckling occurred when the fuel rod segment between the bottom two spacer
grids reached the Euler buckling limit. The weight of fuel pellets was neglected in the analysis;
The purpose of this guidance is to, (1) clarify the meaning of a real individual as used in 10
CFR 72.104, (2) specify how the applicant may perform dose evaluations beyond the controlled
area for site-specific and general Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) licenses,
and (3) clarify standard review plan (SRP) text regarding dose calculations outside the
controlled area.
Guidance regarding supplemental shielding that may be installed at an independent
spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 72.104(a).
Due, in part, to a number of material-related issues identified during dry cask storage system
(DCSS) and transportation package application reviews and field implementation, the staff has
recognized the need for specific guidance for the review of materials selected by the applicant
for its DCSS or transportation package.
Issuance of specific guidance for review of Emergency Plans for facilities licensed pursuant to
10 CFR Part 72 and removal of the reference to Regulatory Guide 3.67, "Standard Format and
Content for Emergency Plans for Fuel Cycle and Materials Facilities," as included in NUREG-
1567, Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities (March 2000).
Guidance is necessary on the interim storage of greater than Class C (GTCC) waste due to the
revision of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 72. The revision to 10
CFR Part 72 is documented in final rule, ìInterim Storage for GTCC Waste,î and permits the
storage of GTCC wastes at independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSI) or monitored
retrievable storage (MRS) facilities. The GTCC wastes, if stored at an ISFSI, must be in solid
form, and stored in a separate container (i.e., GTCC waste may not be stored in a cask that
The purpose of this ISG is to address the design and testing of the various closure welds (“lid
welds”) associated with the redundant closure of all-welded austenitic stainless steel canisters:
As an acceptable confinement boundary under 10 CFR Part 72.236(e) (Ref. 1) for
purposes of demonstrating no credible leakage of radioactive material during storage
and satisfying the dose limits under normal and off-normal conditions in 10 CFR Parts
72.104(a) and 72.106(b).
This Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) provides review guidance for meeting the fissile material
package standards in 10 CFR 71.55(e). The provisions of 71.55(e) require that a fissile
material package be subcritical under hypothetical accident conditions assuming that the fissile
material is in the most reactive credible configuration consistent with the damaged condition of
the package and the chemical and physical form of the contents, and water moderation occurs
to the most reactive credible extent consistent with the damaged condition of the package and
The standard review plans for storage of spent nuclear fuel and transportation of fissile
materials do not address, in detail, the technical considerations for crediting the neutron
absorber content of metal matrix composites used for preventing nuclear criticality. The Division
of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation (SFST) considers the application of acceptance
criteria and methodology described in the recently developed American Standard for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) standard practice C1671-07, “Standard Practice for Qualification and
Authority for licensees to transport radioactive material comes from 10 CFR Part 71. Licensees
are authorized to transport Type B quantities and fissile materials in NRC-certified packages
under the general license in 71.17. Unlike 10 CFR Part 72, Part 71 does not include change
authority, that is, there is no specific Part 71 regulation that allows licensees to make changes in
the design or operation of an NRC-certified package without prior NRC approval. However,
Given the growing industry need to store spent reactor fuel of increasingly higher burnups and
heat loads in dry storage casks, and eventually to transport that same spent fuel in
transportation packages, analyzing the performance of casks and other radioactive material
packages has become a greater challenge. Finite Element, Finite Difference, and Finite
Volume analysis computer codes, defined here as Computational Modeling Software (CMS),
are tools used by many licensees to analyze cask and package performance in the structural
Under the current guidance in ISG-1, Revision 1, “Damaged Fuel,” the definition of intact fuel
includes fuel rods containing no cladding defects greater than pinhole leaks or hairline cracks.
During the cask water removal process parts of, or all of, the fuel rods will be exposed to a
gaseous atmosphere. If the gaseous atmosphere is oxidizing, oxidation of fuel pellets or fuel
fragments can occur if a cladding breach exists (such as a pinhole). Oxidation may occur
The purpose of this interim staff guidance (ISG) is to supplement standard review plan guidance
for evaluating the helium leakage testing and ASME Code1
required pressure
(hydrostatic/pneumatic) testing that is specified for the dry storage system (DSS) confinement
boundary. These acceptance tests are necessary to clearly demonstrate that the DSS
confinement boundary has been fabricated in accordance with the design criteria, and that its
operation complies with the intended safety bases of the confinement system and regulatory
This report summarizes the results of EPRI’s multi-year research effort to assess cladding
performance under normal and hypothetical accident conditions of spent nuclear fuel
transportation.
Progress toward developing a technical basis for a cost-effective burnup credit methodology for
spent nuclear fuel with initial U-235 enrichment up to 5% is presented. Present regulatory
practices provide as much burnup credit flexibility as can be currently expected. Further progress
is achievable by incorporating the negative reactivity effects of a subset of neutron-absorbing
fission product isotopes. Progress also depends on optimizing the procedure for establishing the
In his January 12, 1993 letter to Senator Johnston, Secretary Watkins promised to develop a
conceptual revised program strategy for public review. The enclosed document represents the
final report of the Task Force on an Alternative Program Strategy that was established to fulfill
that commitment. The report incorporates refinements to the preliminary draft you received on
March 8, based on discussions with key people in the program.
In developing this alternative strategy, the Task Force has drawn on the extensive analyses of
When Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, it created the
Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management within the Department of
Energy to spearhead the implementation of this landmark legislation.
In Section 303 of the Act, however, Congress directed the Secretary of Energy
to study alternative approaches to managing the radioactive waste program, as
follows:
ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF FINANCING
SEC. 303. The Secretary shall undertake a study with respect to
Disclaimer: Note that this page contains links to external sites. When
leaving the CURIE site, please note that the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
do not control or endorse the content or ads on these sites.